An individual owes a duty of care to another individual when it is reasonably foreseeable that the other individual lies within the zone of danger of the first individual's actions according to ordinary understanding.
Quaeritur: Does Wile E. Coyote owe a duty of care to the Roadrunner, given that the universal understanding of reasonable people is that no action undertaken by Wile E. Coyote is injurious to the Roadrunner?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment